Do Libertarians eschew most partisan traps?

Is the US Libertarian party the only political party with staunch supporters who are aptly ready to call out the party when it does something dumb? Republicans & Democrats seldom seem to be able to call out their party.

As of late, I've seen the Democrats who have this Micheal Sandal guy willing to say that the Democrats haven't put up a decent candidate to oppose Trump in 2020, but a lot of Democrats say that and sort of religiously endorse Biden anywho.

Aside - ROFL the presidential race is between these two old, out of touch, Keynesians. 

Aside 2 - To be honest the Democrats had some ludicrous presidential nominees this year too like some new-age mystic lady [See: DnD]. 

Continuation - Yet, for this 2020 election, the Democrats had a promising rising star (a sort of Keynesian superhero) Andrew Yang who seemed willing to call out the democratic party for their bosh – for while at least. Sadly methinks he's given way to pragmatism; because of the putative Trump threat. Along with every other Democratic nominee, Andrew Yang endorsed Biden #Disapointing. Which in my mind twas somewhat sketch that all the Democratic nominees were willing to endorse someone like Biden. Someone with a lousy track record on immigration (very harsh), drugs (war on drugs leader), and worst of all a Keynesian.

In regards to the Republicans and their people who would be willing to call out their party for its humbug. Would prolly be this Justin Amash guy who calls out the poor incentive structure within the US government all the time [See: Justin Amash on "Yang Speaks" juxtapositing how laws get passed in the statehouse versus how laws get passed in congress]. 

Plus, these Republicans have this Rand Paul guy who calls out the dumb nature of making it super impossible for most of the congress-people to have time to read the bills & whatnot. With the result of such having it so only the party leaders supposedly know what's in the bills. These main congress folk ends up whipping the rest of their partisan side into voting whichever way their part leaders, please.

Finally, upon reflection, this Libertarian party is seemingly chockful of these highly individualized people – who (to be honest) are a bit too oppositional to everything. There was one VP candidate who stripped on stage apparently – I'd say that's very oppositional to societies tacit norms. I say the US's Libertarian party may have a superfluity of these disputatious folk. Yet the confounding variable to this situation may be the fact that tis a small 3rd party which draws the highly ideologically motivated or attention-seeking wacky-folk to run as candidates. Also, to that, I hear the Libertarian presidential race is pretty open and easy to join in comparison to the other parties – so that may give way to less established to join the race.

In regards, to calling out political parties for doing dumb stuff. Methinks the Libertarian party shouldn't have picked Spike Cohen as it's 2020 VP pick –albeit I do understand that a podcaster may be good for marketing. I'd prefer to put up a qualified front for a presidential race. With Jo Jorgensen as the presidential pick (something which I approved of wholeheartedly) and Judge Jim Gray as the VP pick. – Murdoch Harris's 2020 Self Who is Leaning Libertarian & Interested In Ricardian Socialism & Anarchic Marxism Whatever Those Are Iteration

Should Capitalists act like Socialists?

If capitalists act like socialists within a free-market system couldn't we have the putative benefits of socialism without the bureaucracy, rules, mandates, superfluity of laws, and whatever else I'm not thinking of right now? My hopes with this "capitalists act like socialists" idea is that capitalists should knock socialists out of the park with their altruism. Charity should be top of mind for capitalists. Capitalists should popularise charities to the point where governments have no reason to expand nor for much of the involuntary situations to occur.

Aside P.S. Does anybody here know how to get into Liberty for North Korea or to volunteer for them. How does one check if a charity organization is legitimate?

A Home For All The Ideologies? A Pan-ideological Utopia.

As a Jreg fan, methinks political ideologies should become tribe thingos that people could visit. It would be cool if all the ideologies could thrive. With the only rules being that everybody has the right to migrate/opt-out of an ideologies city/village/whatever. 

In the case that the ideology draws in masochists who feign to hate being tortured by the ideology most of the time. Should still have the right to migrate if they believed that the tortured outweighed the pleasure they got out of their masochistic whatnot.

Libertarians could live in their Seasteads, Marxists could live in their phalansteries, Republicans could live in their McMansions, Democrats could live in their public housing, etcetera. 

People could raise capital in their secure job in a Marxist state and then move over to a Libertarian state for their investments. 

I believe these ideologies should have within their social contracts that they cannot vote outside their ideology; albeit, the way their ideologies are implemented would be protean. Thence the vote for policy would be more of an inconsequential thingo. In this system of pan-ideological utopia where people's vote is more nonessential than it otherwise would be; people's main tool for evincing their policy preferences would be to go where they're treated best. 

Commenting on a Point From: "Richard D. Wolff Lecture on Worker Coops: Theory and Practice of 21st Century Socialism" [See: 18:12 of Video]

"I don't think there is such a thing as a sensible capitalist who would dislike socialism if it was voluntary. Whether voluntary through the private sector or voluntary via the public sector, but with people having the option to opt out without penalty." Maxwell Murdoch from the Moribund Institute 

Refuting a Point From: "Understanding Marxism: Q&A with Richard D. Wolff [June 2019]"

"Richard Wolff claims capitalism is responsible for people's acceptance of the egregious immigration policy putting people in cages; albeit, tis more likely (in my opinion) that national populism or mercantilism is the cause. If he claimed that state capitalism was the cause of such policy. I would be much more likely to concede this point. Yet... state capitalism and mercantilism sound a lot like socialism to me. At least by popular denotation" -- Murdoch Maxwell from the Moribund Institute