Jordan Peterson seems a bit monomaniacal in regards to this hierarchy/nature over nurture vibe to his argumentation. I Sydney Barbour am in the opposing camp to this "vibe". I prefer a non-positional mindset [An insouciant attitude towards the rat race, especially when someone has gratitude for things regardless of how they may benefit from them in regard to the pecking order.]. I suppose my position comes out of constructivism, social constructivism, nurture over nature/nurture over the hereditarian arguments, and radical fluid identity theory [which posits that many of the putative unchangeable characteristics, such as race or gender,will become irrefutably protean in the future given we reach the point where it's technologically possible to do things like switch genders or race more easily & or in a (more) irrefutable manner. Supposed unchangeable characteristics would become patently changeable & analogous to the clothes one chooses to wear or the colour of hair one chooses to have.].
I do like his grow the pie vibes & his opposition to cherry-picking the 1% that would conveniently leave out the middle class of highly developed countries as opposed to the significantly less well-to-do countries.I dig him calling out some hypocrisy of them phony statisticians -- dude.
: